Training an Courses

Anything is possible.

I'm occasionally asked if I pass on my successful concepts through training or integration.

The answer: It's planned.

Regardless of my own commitment here, engaging with this field feels immensely important. I can hardly imagine how sustainable treatment for dependents can happen given the healthcare system's structure. Proposed paths are often too long, inaccessible to many, or they're "not sick enough." Massively expanding staff is barely fundable, and state support has long been unsustainable. Moreover, expect the number of dependents to multiply due to anticipated societal disruptions and the structural changes in detection we discussed. We should also question if classic approaches remain timely.

How things evolve in this field — whatever shape it takes — remains unclear. Personally, I assume it will take years, if not decades, for needed support to reach affected parties and dependents "across the board." Then the question arises: Won't that be too late?

I'm collaborating with experts in substance dependency and specialists from various disciplines — medicine, psychology, philosophy, spirituality — on concepts for solid training or further education.

The goal: Take the best from each world and forge it into an effective, efficient method — beyond regulatory hurdles. These often hinder processes, despite clear evidence of enhanced combinatorial effectiveness.

This issue doesn't arise for me, as my plural qualifications make certain requirements irrelevant. I can methodically integrate these sensible combinations anyway.

Liquified Knowledge

The aim is an interdisciplinary new field — ideally gaining its own certification. But in an increasingly regulated environment focused solely on protecting individual disciplines' status quo, that's hardly feasible.

This standalone field would grant graduates moderated competencies, giving them added value to operate legitimized — not as illegal emigrants in a discipline's shadow.

In the spiritual sector as I define it, I'm working with leading experts on secularizing "transformation meditations." These could provide a valuable complement to guided methods, permanently available amid media mobility.

Currently, the main issue is that classic approaches can feel indoctrinating at times. This must fundamentally stop — it has far more harmful effects than generally assumed.

Everyone should realize meditation prepares your own cognitive space, not entering someone else's fully furnished living room.

Like neutral Vipassana or secularized forms such as MBSR, awareness and self-reflection should take center stage. This already explains the basic difficulty when starting from distorted, absurd worldviews.

In due time, I'll report on progress in this work area.