The Development of Society

mastered master of matrix

My core models, tailored individually to you, aren't just about adapting to the "here and now" — though that's often the talk. Prevention matters too, as the social and technical environment keeps changing, faster and faster.

Before, during, and after the path we walk together.

I keep a watchful eye on what's been discussed for some time as transhumanism, post-humanism, or more specifically post-privacy — topics still happily controversial.

Sadly, some processes are already implemented, seemingly irreversibly, while work feverishly advances on dependencies for the next generations.

Focus on the Core

I have a special interest here in the development of ethics around Type-3 "Theory of Mind" AIs.

I'm often seen as an AI critic, which isn't accurate. Quite the opposite: I deliberately use AI in my own workflow models and proprietary projects I initiate. My goals just differ from most users. I approach answers critically, focusing purely on their explanatory power. This means I already know the response field in essence and seek an alternative synthesis of knowledge.

This stance permeates my work, because I know it's about asking the right questions — not chasing quick answers.

In an era overflowing with responses, confirming whether an AI is right or wrong can't be the point. Yet it's equally wrong to dismiss hallucinations, as they offer valuable insights into fields still unknown to us.

Artificial loss of Mind

On excessive use: We should reflect more on experiences rather than posting them immediately. Whether "fake" or "copy-paste," clarity is key at all times — these are data reaching and shaping us and our society as information.

It’s worth seriously considering situationally whether chasing reach truly serves a sustainable purpose — if any purpose exists at all.

For me, using AI is craftsmanship. A serving tool gets wielded to create something.

Sometimes the creation misses the mark or produces waste — simply discard it.

Sometimes something new, genuine emerges — something that didn't exist before or lay hidden.

That's different: something with real added value.

For the same reason, I maintain a similarly critical focus on global agendas with their referenced goals (e.g., SDGs, MDGs, and others worked on behind the scenes), which also unfold local effects. Strategies against expected disruptions get integrated as ongoing preventive constructs.

We'll inevitably face ever more profound incursions into what defines our very selves. These approaches are already globally noticeable today.

It's foreseeable that the many "positive side effects" hyped in global development will have side effects too. These will significantly shape our future lives — and we should be aware of that now. At essence, it boils down to the question:

Do we want to live like this?